USPTO serial 74801054
ELOR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TINGLEY, JOHN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ELOR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
TEL BARUCH, TEL-AVIV, IL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ALVIN BROWDY
ALVIN BROWDY BROWDY AND NEIMARK419 SEVENTH ST N WSTE 300WASHINGTON, DC 20004Goods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 14, 1993 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 16, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 19, 1993 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 4, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 12, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 18, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 18, 1992 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 17, 1991 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 9, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 11, 1991 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 29, 1990 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 6, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 5, 1990 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 24, 1989 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 2, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 3, 1989 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 10, 1988 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 9, 1988 | ZZZZ | ALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jul 14, 1988 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 8, 1988 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |