USPTO serial 74801455
WELLBODY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SEEGARS, GERALD C.
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with WELLBODY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Stanley W. Sokoloff
STANLEY W SOKOLOFF BLAKELY SOKOLOFF TAYLOR & ZAFMAN12400 WILSHIRE BLVDSEVENTH FLLOS ANGELES, CA 90025Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | skin care products; namely, skin moisturizers, facial moisturizers, moisturizing masques, facial toners, facial treatments, facial gelees, facial scrubs, cleansing milks, and facial masques | ABANDONED | May 25, 1993 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 16, 1996 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jan 16, 1996 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 16, 1996 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 16, 1996 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 8, 1994 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 3, 1994 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| May 17, 1994 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 15, 1994 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 15, 1993 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 10, 1993 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 22, 1993 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Oct 19, 1993 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 19, 1993 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 27, 1993 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 24, 1993 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 4, 1993 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jul 27, 1993 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 12, 1993 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 12, 1993 | 1.BA | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM ADDED | — |
| Jul 12, 1993 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 12, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 23, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 26, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |