USPTO serial 74801684
THE ZONE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LEVINE, HOWARD B
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with THE ZONE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Martin F. Majestic
MARTIN F MAJESTIC MAJESTIC PARSONS SIEBERT & HSUE4 EMBARCADERO CTRSTE 1100SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111-4121Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | men's and women's clothing, specifically T-shirts, sweat shirts and underwear | ACTIVE | Jun 1, 1991 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 5, 2000 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 11, 2000 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 12, 1999 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 29, 1999 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jun 29, 1999 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 22, 1996 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 4, 1996 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 5, 1995 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 22, 1995 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 3, 1995 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 18, 1995 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 16, 1995 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 22, 1994 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 18, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 2, 1994 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 24, 1994 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 23, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 21, 1994 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 12, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 12, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 16, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 5, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 14, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |