USPTO serial 74801732
TRASH TALK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 608
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FICKES, JERI J
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TRASH TALK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John L. Beard
JOHN L BEARD GODFREY & KAHN, SC780 N WATER STMILWAUKEE, WI 53202UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | basketball sports apparel and accessories; namely, T-shirts and hats | ABANDONED | Jul 1, 1993 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 27, 1995 | PR.D | PETITION TO REVIVE DISMISSED | — |
| Aug 14, 1995 | PILM | PETITION INQUIRY LETTER ISSUED | — |
| Feb 21, 1995 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 21, 1995 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Feb 16, 1995 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 16, 1995 | PCRC | PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 19, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 29, 1994 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 29, 1994 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| May 25, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 5, 1994 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 25, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 3, 1994 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 3, 1994 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 27, 1993 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 13, 1993 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 15, 1993 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 2, 1993 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 4, 1992 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 12, 1992 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 10, 1992 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 3, 1992 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 5, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 3, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 29, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 20, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 17, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 6, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |