USPTO serial 74802154
GRINGO-MEX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FIRST, VIVIAN M
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with GRINGO-MEX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Thomas N. Giaccherini
THOMAS N GIACCHERINI ANGLIN & GIACCHERINIP O BOX 1146CARMEL VALLEY, CA 93924UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | dehydrated foods, packaged foods, and frozen foods, namely baked, dried and processed beans, and soups; American/Mexican foods, namely roast poultry, ham, and roast beef | ABANDONED | — |
| 030 | dehydrated foods, packaged foods, and frozen foods, namely sourdough bread, sourdough tortillas, sourdough enchiladas, rice, sourdough bread chilipockets, marinades and sauces (barbecue, chili, cheese, hot, and tomato); American/Mexican foods, namely sourdough hot dog sandwiches, burritos, and sourdough bread mixes, sourdough bread and rice | ABANDONED | — |
| 042 | contract food services | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 28, 1997 | LEXT | LATE FILED EXTENSION REQUEST | — |
| Oct 24, 1997 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 21, 1997 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 10, 1997 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 22, 1997 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 10, 1997 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 2, 1996 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 24, 1996 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 23, 1996 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 23, 1996 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 30, 1996 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 29, 1995 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 6, 1995 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 21, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 4, 1995 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 18, 1995 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 26, 1994 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 25, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 14, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 7, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 26, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |