Drawing for TIVOLI

USPTO serial 74802173

TIVOLI

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3115561Status 710
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jul 18, 2006
Examiner
SPARROW, MARY
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.

Status 710: Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active.

Need help with TIVOLI?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

MARY A. MOY

MARY A. MOY Ladas & Parry LLP1040 Avenue of the AmericasNew York, NY 10018-3738UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007(Based on 44(e) Registration No; 534900) Electric beaters, electric can openers, electric grinders or crushers for domestic use, dishwashers, garbage/waste disposals, spin driers, electric food processors, electric food presses for household purposes, electric knives, meat mincers and choppers, mixers, paring and peeling machines, washing machines, wringing machines for laundry, vacuum cleaners, vacuum cleaner hosesSECTION 8 - CANCELLED—
009(Based on 44(e) Registration No; 534902) Electric flat irons, electrically heated hair curlersSECTION 8 - CANCELLED—
011(Based on 44(e) Registration No; IDM000008479) Electric cookers, electric deep fryers, hand held electric hair dryers and domestic cooking electric ovens, electric pressure cookers/autoclaves, electric pressure cookers, electric saucepans, electric toasters, refrigerators, electric waffle irons, electric kettlesSECTION 8 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 22, 2013C8..CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR)—
Mar 30, 2011TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 21, 2009ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 21, 2009REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jul 18, 2006R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Apr 25, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 5, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 2, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 27, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 25, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jan 23, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 23, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jan 23, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Nov 14, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Nov 3, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 3, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 29, 2005RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Feb 18, 2005RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Feb 17, 2005RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Feb 9, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 20, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jul 13, 2004CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jun 23, 2004IUCNNOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED—
May 5, 2004PCGRPETITION TO DIRECTOR GRANTED—
Apr 22, 2004FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Jan 27, 2004EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Dec 19, 2003EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Dec 19, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 20, 20031.BDSec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED—
Nov 20, 200344EASEC. 44(E) CLAIM ADDED—
Nov 20, 2003PCRCPETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED—
Nov 20, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 29, 2003EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Aug 26, 2003PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jun 30, 2003EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jun 30, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 2, 2003PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Jun 2, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 18, 2003ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 2, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jan 2, 2003EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jul 2, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 1, 2002OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
May 1, 2002OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999—
Jul 17, 1995OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Jun 21, 1995OPPFOPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB—
May 23, 1995PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 21, 1995NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 11, 1995CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 9, 1994DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Oct 14, 1994CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 7, 1994DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 12, 1994CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 15, 1994DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 4, 1994DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 6, 1993CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 1, 1993CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 16, 1993DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance