USPTO serial 74802433
AMBER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 608
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LAWRENCE, ANDREW D
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with AMBER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lawrence R. Jordan
LAWRENCE R JORDAN SEELIGSON AND JORDAN301 E LIBERTY, STE 680ANN ARBOR, MI 48104UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer software for role playing, science fiction and fantasy adventures; pre-recorded audio tapes featuring oral reading | ABANDONED | May 13, 1969 |
| 016 | fiction books; comic books, science fiction magazines and science fantasy magazines; tarot cards; playing cards | ABANDONED | May 13, 1990 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 7, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 11, 1998 | PR.W | PETITION TO REVIVE WITHDRAWN | — |
| Nov 7, 1997 | PRIM | PETITION INQUIRY LETTER MAILED | — |
| May 28, 1997 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 1, 1997 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 19, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 13, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 17, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 1, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 11, 1995 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 2, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 29, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 23, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 1, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |