Drawing for HIT&RUN

USPTO serial 74802473

HIT&RUN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LEVY, MICHAEL S
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HIT&RUN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

PAUL I MENES

PAUL I MENES MENES LAW CORPORATION1801 CENTURY PARK E STE 1560LOS ANGELES, CA 90067UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
014wristwatchesACTIVE—
016posters, decals, bumper stickers, concert programs, mounted photographs, book covers, newsletters about music, music fan newsletters, photograph albums, paper banners, printed music books, song books, calendars, notepads, trading cards, looseleaf binders, pencil and pen cases, desk pads, diaries, paper emblems, embroidery design patterns, coloring books, gummed paper, sheet music, paper pennants and postcardsACTIVE—
024cloth pennantsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 30, 2001ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 30, 2001ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 15, 2000EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Apr 17, 2000EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Oct 6, 1999EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Oct 6, 1999EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Apr 18, 1999EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Mar 30, 1999EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Feb 18, 1999EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Oct 19, 1998EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Apr 21, 1998NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 24, 1997REINREINSTATED—
May 19, 1997IUCNNOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED—
Nov 19, 1996NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 1, 1995ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Oct 31, 1995PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 2, 1995NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 9, 1995CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 12, 1995CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
May 26, 1995DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Apr 6, 1995CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 9, 1995CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 7, 1995DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 2, 1995DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance