USPTO serial 74802786
DEEP. SEE. EXPERIENCE.
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 607
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GREENBAUM, CINDY BETH
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DEEP. SEE. EXPERIENCE.?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MATTHEW P HAMMATT
MATTHEW P HAMMATT KIRKLAND & ELLIS200 E RANDOLPH DR STE 5300CHICAGO, IL 60601UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | pens, paper placemats, menus, postcards, notecards, stationery and writing paper | ABANDONED | — |
| 042 | restaurants, bars, nightclubs and carry-out restaurants all featuring a simulated submarine environment and all featuring the presentation of films and video tapes there | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 9, 1998 | ABN7 | ABANDONMENT - DEFECTIVE USE STATEMENT | — |
| Sep 8, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 6, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 5, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 26, 1998 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 30, 1997 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 30, 1997 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 1, 1997 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 6, 1997 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 6, 1997 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 26, 1996 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 1, 1996 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 2, 1996 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 31, 1996 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 8, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 12, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 12, 1996 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 11, 1996 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 1, 1996 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 23, 1995 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 25, 1995 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Aug 31, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 23, 1995 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 6, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 5, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 23, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |