USPTO serial 74802796
SOMETHING CAN BE DONE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 7, 1996
- Examiner
- LAWRENCE, ANDREW D
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with SOMETHING CAN BE DONE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Toronto, Ontario M4T 2S8, CA
Toronto, Ontario M4T 2S8, CA
Toronto, Ontario M4T 2S8, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
NOEL I. SMITH
NOEL I SMITH LEYDIG, VOIT & MAYERTWO PRODENTIAL PLZ STE 4900CHICAGO, IL 60601UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 031 | pet food, namely dog and cat food; and dog biscuits | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 8, 2003 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| May 7, 1996 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 25, 1996 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Feb 25, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 29, 1996 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 29, 1996 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 13, 1995 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 13, 1994 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 20, 1994 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 19, 1994 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 5, 1994 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 16, 1994 | 1.BA | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM ADDED | — |
| Feb 16, 1994 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 13, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 30, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 26, 1993 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jun 23, 1993 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 1, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 2, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 5, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 10, 1992 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 8, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 8, 1991 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 31, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 5, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 21, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 2, 1989 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |