USPTO serial 74802826
RUGBY WORLD CUP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 23, 1997
- Examiner
- TINGLEY, JOHN
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with RUGBY WORLD CUP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
DOUGLAS, GB
Sydney, New South Wales, AU
Douglas, GB
Clerkenwell Green, London, GB
DOUGLAS, GB
DUBLIN 2, IE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DONALD N. HUFF
DONALD N HUFF DYKEMA GOSSETT PLLC1300 I ST NWTHIRD FLOOR WESTWASHINGTON, DC 20005Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | [ facial tissues; ] printed matter, namely, books, magazines, brochures, programs, all relating to sports; [ book marks; ] posters; photographs; [ diaries; calendars; address and notebooks; stickers; maps; postcards; notepads; scorecards; trivia cards; clipboards; file folders; pens; pencils; ordinary playing cards ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 025 | sports and leisure clothing, namely, [ hats, boots, shoes, ties, ] caps, T-shirts, sweatshirts, [ sweatpants, ] polo shirts, rugby shirts; [ sweat bands and wrist bands ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by RUGBY WORLD CUP LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by Rugby World Cup Pty. Limited
- Other trademarks owned by West Nally Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Chelsea Promotions Limited
- Other trademarks owned by RUGBY WORLD CUP LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by RUGBY WORLD CUP LIMITED
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named RUGBY WORLD CUP
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 24, 2020 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Dec 23, 2016 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 3, 2016 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Apr 26, 2011 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 20, 2011 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jan 18, 2008 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Jan 18, 2008 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Jan 3, 2008 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 21, 2007 | 89AF | REGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED | — |
| Dec 21, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 18, 2007 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 27, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 25, 2004 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jun 14, 2004 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Feb 11, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 23, 1997 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 30, 1997 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 29, 1997 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 11, 1997 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 9, 1996 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Aug 30, 1996 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 30, 1996 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Apr 18, 1996 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 3, 1996 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 27, 1995 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Sep 12, 1995 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 24, 1995 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 24, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 23, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 4, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 4, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 16, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 16, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 10, 1993 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 28, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 28, 1992 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 9, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 5, 1992 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 19, 1991 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 29, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 31, 1991 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 20, 1990 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 5, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 5, 1990 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 12, 1989 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 1, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 6, 1989 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 22, 1988 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 2, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 3, 1988 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 28, 1987 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 7, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 8, 1987 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 13, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 13, 1986 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |