USPTO serial 74802834
YOUNGBLOOD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- REIHNER, DAVID
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with YOUNGBLOOD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Susan Upton Douglass
SUSAN UPTON DOUGLASS WEISS DAWID FROSS ZELNICK & LEHRMAN633 THIRD AVENEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATESGoods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 12, 1997 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 2, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 27, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 21, 1996 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 20, 1996 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 12, 1996 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 14, 1995 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 17, 1995 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 28, 1995 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 21, 1994 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 21, 1994 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 27, 1994 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| May 22, 1994 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 15, 1994 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 21, 1993 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 24, 1993 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 4, 1993 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 13, 1993 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 26, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 30, 1993 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 29, 1993 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Apr 8, 1993 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Mar 17, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 14, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 1, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 26, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 19, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |