Drawing for UNITED TECHNOLOGIES

USPTO serial 75001229

UNITED TECHNOLOGIES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
TUCCILLO, SUSANA M.
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with UNITED TECHNOLOGIES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Alan C. Cohen

ALAN C COHEN UNITED TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATIONONE FINANCIAL PLZHARTFORD, CT 06101UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009computer hardware and software used in the real time measurement of moving or stationary objects, including object parameters such as spatial orientation, dimensions; velocity, and object distance; computer software used for the computerized analysis of opto-electronic generated data, namely, wavefront sensor data and particle velocity data; comptuer software and hardware, including real time integer co-processors, used for high speed control systems and for real time imaging, including real time camera tracking and real time facial expression tracking; camera hardware assuring minimal pattern artifacts in mini-output detector cameras, namely, micro-optical devices and monolithic lenslet modules; motion capture and imaging equipment for computer generated facial animation, namely, fiber optic image conduits and optical scanners; electro-optical and optical image processing equipment, and component parts thereof, namely, lenses, lens arrays, optical discs, filters, mirrors, optical character recognition apparatus (OCR), and optical lens sights; and electro-optical link between remote camera and base stationABANDONED—
042engineering services for the design and application of electro-optical imaging equipmentABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 4, 1998ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 15, 1998EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Dec 3, 1997EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jun 3, 1997NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 11, 1997PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 7, 1997NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 7, 1997CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 1, 1996CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 3, 1996CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 26, 1996DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 19, 1996DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance