Drawing for PRO POWER

USPTO serial 75001240

PRO POWER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
AXILBUND, MELVIN
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PRO POWER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

BARTH X DEROSA

1615 L ST NW STE 850WASHINGTON, DC 20036-5622UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009electrical power extension cords; electrical wiring devices, namely, convenience receptacles, multiple outlet adapters, non-metal electric cord storage reels, non-metal electric extension cord storage reels, circuit interrupters, outdoor electrical cord plug adapters, multiple outlet strips, replacement appliance plugs and interior wiring assemblies for household appliances, cable assemblies, electrical wiring harnesses; integrated electrical wiring harnesses; electrical cables, non-metal electric power receptacle posts, electric goods, namely, voltage surge protectors, voltage surge suppressers, transfer switches, splitters, instrument meters and test equipment, namely, watt meters, ammeters, ohmmeters, and mega meters; photo-electric controls for use in domestic lighting applications; programmable electrical controllersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 24, 2002ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
May 10, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 13, 2002CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Feb 8, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 4, 2002REINREINSTATED—
Apr 12, 2001PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Jan 3, 2001ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 14, 2000IUCNNOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED—
Mar 14, 2000NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 12, 1999ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Mar 16, 1999PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 12, 1999NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 18, 1998CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 5, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 2, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 3, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 26, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 23, 1998CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Mar 3, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 3, 1997CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Sep 2, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 16, 1997CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jan 16, 1997ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Dec 24, 1996CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 1, 1996CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 2, 1996CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 19, 1996DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance