USPTO serial 75001473
CARTO'S MAPS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RUPP, TERRY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CARTO'S MAPS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DEBORAH S. SHEPHERD
DEBORAH S SHEPHERD KNOBBE, MARTENS, OLSON & BEAR LLP2040 MAIN ST 14TH FLIRVINE, CA 92614UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | motion pictures and television films comprised of live action and/or animated cartoons; computer programs, video discs and pre-recorded compact discs featuring interactive adventure stories for home use | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 28, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 2, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 24, 2002 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 8, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 23, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 22, 2001 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 22, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 26, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 12, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 14, 1999 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 18, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 19, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 26, 1998 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 17, 1998 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 17, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 15, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 18, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 17, 1997 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 4, 1997 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Nov 15, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 9, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 23, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 18, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |