Drawing for PETE APPROVED

USPTO serial 75002482

PETE APPROVED

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FRONT, MITCHELL
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PETE APPROVED?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Anthony H. Handal

ANTHONY H HANDAL HANDAL & MOROFSKY80 WASHINGTON STNORWALK, CT 06854UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009pre-recorded audio tapes in the field of diet and nutrition; pre-recorded video tapes in the field of diet and nutrition; pre-recorded video tapes in the field of a diet programACTIVE—
016books in the field of diet and nutrition; catalogs in the field of diet and nutrition; food guide books; books and catalogs relating to a diet programACTIVE—
041educational services, namely, conducting classes, seminars, conferences and workshops in the field of identifying foods having superior dietary and nutritional characteristics and distributing course materials in connection therewith; television programs in the field of diet and nutritionACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 7, 2000ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 9, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 9, 1998ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Oct 24, 1997EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Oct 6, 1997EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Aug 26, 1997NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 3, 1997PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 2, 1997NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 3, 1997CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 5, 1997CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Dec 30, 1996CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 24, 1996CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 31, 1996DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance