USPTO serial 75002535
MINT JULEP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- —
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MINT JULEP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Steven C. Schnedler
STEVEN C SCHNEDLER CARTER & SCCHNEDLER, PA56 CENTRAL AVE #103P O BOX 2985ASHEVILLE, NC 28802Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 032 | apple juice; aerated fruit juices; colas; concentrates, syrups or powders used in the preparation of soft drink; fruit juice concentrates; essences for the manufacture of liqueurs; essences for use in making soft drinks; essences for use in the manufacture of liqueurs; fruit drinks; fruit flavored soft drinks; fruit juice concentrates; fruit juices; fruit nectars; fruit punch; lemonade; malt syrup for beverages; mineral water; non-alcoholic cocktail mixes; pop; preparations for making fruit drinks; punch; soft drinks; spring water; syrup for making lemonade; syrups for making fruit drinks; syrup used in the preparation of soft drinks; syrup for making soft drinks | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 23, 1997 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 28, 1996 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 16, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 13, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 28, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |