Drawing for JONES DIGITAL RANCH

USPTO serial 75003824

JONES DIGITAL RANCH

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GLYNN, GERALD
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with JONES DIGITAL RANCH?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Thomas C. Folsom

THOMAS C FOLSOM CHRISMAN BYNUM & JOHNSON P1900 15TH STBOULDER, CO 80302-5414UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035information storage and retrieval in the fields of news, finance, stock quotes, education information and softwareACTIVE—
042computer services, namely, leasing access time to computer and network databases containing news sports, financial, entertainment, and educational information; providing on-line services, namely, home shopping, conferencing, computer information, data download, library reference materials; managing data servers (hosts), platforms for data exchange and related infrastructure software; and providing access to global information networksACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 2, 2001ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 30, 2000EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Sep 11, 2000EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
May 11, 2000EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Mar 16, 2000EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Oct 18, 1999EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Sep 16, 1999EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Apr 12, 1999EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Mar 17, 1999EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Oct 10, 1998EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Sep 17, 1998EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Mar 17, 1998NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 23, 1997PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 21, 1997NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 21, 1997CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 2, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 28, 1997CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 13, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 9, 1996CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 5, 1996ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jul 12, 1996CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 1, 1996CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 29, 1996CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 15, 1996DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance