Drawing for TELES

USPTO serial 75004386

TELES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
RAUEN, JAMES
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TELES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

D. Bruce Prout

D BRUCE PROUT CHRISTINE, PARKER & HALEP O BOX 7068PASADENA, CA 91109-7068UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009printed wiring boards for PC and other microcomputers; networking boards for PC and other microcomputers; video boards for PC and other microcomputers; computer programs for controlling printed wiring boards, networking boards and video boards, each for PC and other microcomputers; computer programs for data communication; software for operation of telecommunication systems; development assistance software for software development; digital private branch exchanges (PBXS); multimedia hardware and software, namely, hardware and software for coding and decoding of audio and video signals for PC and other microcomputers, ISDN-compatible printed wiring boards for coding and decoding of audio and video signals, video cameras, microphones, loudspeakers, computer displays, and ISDN-compatible telephones; video-on-demand multimedia hardware and software for output of audio and video signals from PC and other microcomputers; videoconferencing multimedia hardware and software for telecommunications between users of PCs and other microcomputersABANDONED—
042consulting and design services in the field of computer hardware and softwareABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 5, 1998ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 12, 1998EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Nov 18, 1997EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jul 1, 1997NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 24, 1997IUCNNOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED—
Feb 18, 1997NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 26, 1996PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 25, 1996NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 29, 1996CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 26, 1996CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jul 26, 1996CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 2, 1996CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 30, 1996DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance