USPTO serial 75004938
HEALTHY BRAND
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2263803Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 20, 1999
- Examiner
- SLOAN, CYNTHIA
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with HEALTHY BRAND?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Benita Kichler
BENITA KICHLER LEGAL DEPTWINN-DIXIE STORES INC5050 EDGEWOOD CTJACKSONVILLE, FL 32254Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | milk, cheeses, yogurts, processed and fresh poultry and meats, and fruit-based snack foods | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 030 | ice cream, ice milk, frozen yogurt, breakfast cereals, cereal-based snack food, granola-based snack food, wheat based snack food, rice-based snack food, popped popcorn, processed popcorn | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 13, 2006 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Apr 22, 2006 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Nov 22, 2005 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 22, 2005 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 20, 1999 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Apr 30, 1999 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 30, 1999 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 26, 1999 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 16, 1998 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 5, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 2, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 8, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 23, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 29, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 4, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 28, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 7, 1997 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 8, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 9, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 11, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |