USPTO serial 75006702
BLITZBURGH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ZAK, HENRY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BLITZBURGH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | clothing, namely hats, T-shirts and sweatshirts | ACTIVE | Dec 31, 2002 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 26, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 14, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 26, 2003 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 19, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 16, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 5, 2003 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 20, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 16, 2002 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jul 29, 2002 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 19, 2002 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| May 16, 2002 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| May 16, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 19, 2002 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 16, 2001 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 10, 2001 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 8, 2001 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 16, 2001 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| May 16, 2001 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 18, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 16, 2000 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 16, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 22, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 21, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 22, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 14, 1999 | EXPR | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL REVERSED | — |
| Jan 5, 1999 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 31, 1998 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Dec 2, 1997 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 10, 1997 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 20, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 18, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |