USPTO serial 75008151
PERFORMANCE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 23, 2002
- Examiner
- BILLINGS, JESSIE W
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with PERFORMANCE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
FLYNN McNEIL RAHEB AND ASSOCIATES LIMITED
Toronto, Ontario, CA
Other trademarks owned by FLYNN McNEIL RAHEB AND ASSOCIATES LIMITED
FLYNN McNEIL RAHEB AND ASSOCIATES LIMITED
Toronto, Ontario, CA
Other trademarks owned by FLYNN McNEIL RAHEB AND ASSOCIATES LIMITED
FLYNN McNEIL RAHEB AND ASSOCIATES LIMITED
Toronto, Ontario, CA
Other trademarks owned by FLYNN McNEIL RAHEB AND ASSOCIATES LIMITED
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Philip A. Jones
PHILIP A JONES WILLIAN BRINKS HOFER GILSON & LIONEP O BOX 10395CHICAGO, IL 60610UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer software, namely, core accounting and financial programs, for use in the retail banking, health care, and mass transit industries | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by FLYNN McNEIL RAHEB AND ASSOCIATES LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by FLYNN McNEIL RAHEB AND ASSOCIATES LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by FLYNN McNEIL RAHEB AND ASSOCIATES LIMITED
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named PERFORMANCE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 25, 2009 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Sep 28, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 13, 2006 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 25, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 23, 2002 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 10, 2002 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| May 24, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 4, 2001 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 30, 2001 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 12, 2001 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Sep 12, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 20, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 19, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 3, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 15, 2000 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 7, 2000 | 44EA | SEC. 44(E) CLAIM ADDED | — |
| Feb 1, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 27, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 2, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 29, 1998 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 21, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 16, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 20, 1998 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 5, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 3, 1997 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 17, 1996 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 4, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 3, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 26, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 17, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |