USPTO serial 75010230
OLD HAVANA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STRZYZ, KAREN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - MANAGING ATTORNEY
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with OLD HAVANA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jennifer Parkins Rabin
MARCELL FELIPE1401 BRICKELL AVENUESUITE 500MIAMI, FL 33131Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 033 | Rum | ACTIVE | Oct 5, 1995 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 21, 2012 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 21, 2012 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 14, 2012 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jun 6, 2012 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jun 6, 2012 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 20, 2012 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Jun 7, 2011 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 7, 2011 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 7, 2011 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 8, 2011 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 27, 2011 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 27, 2011 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 27, 2011 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 24, 2010 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 9, 2010 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 9, 2010 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 2, 2010 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 2, 2010 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Feb 2, 2010 | GNS1 | NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Feb 2, 2010 | GNSF | SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Feb 2, 2010 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 26, 2010 | GNS1 | NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Jan 26, 2010 | GNSF | SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Jan 26, 2010 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 9, 2009 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 15, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 15, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 15, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 15, 2009 | PGRR | PETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 10, 2009 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jun 8, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 8, 2009 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| May 29, 2009 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 29, 2009 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 8, 2009 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Apr 8, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 8, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 3, 2008 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Sep 3, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 3, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 3, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 3, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 3, 2008 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Sep 3, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 11, 2008 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 11, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 2, 2008 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Dec 5, 2007 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 4, 2007 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 10, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 27, 2007 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Sep 13, 2007 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Sep 13, 2007 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 13, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 13, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 13, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 6, 2007 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 29, 2007 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Aug 7, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 18, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 1, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 30, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 10, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 6, 2007 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 6, 2007 | ABND | ABANDONMENT DELETED BY TTAB | — |
| Mar 1, 2007 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 9, 2007 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Feb 8, 2007 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 29, 2007 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 22, 2007 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jan 19, 2007 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jan 19, 2007 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 9, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 30, 2003 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 20, 2003 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 20, 2003 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 15, 2003 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Oct 25, 2002 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Oct 7, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 7, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 7, 2002 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Feb 4, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 7, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 12, 1996 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 8, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 18, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 17, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 5, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 29, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |