USPTO serial 75010235
LOW-C METAL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GAYNOR, BARBARA ANNE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with LOW-C METAL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
BREAKTHROUGH TECHNOLOGIES INC.
Winnipge, Manitoba, CA
Winnipeg, Manitoba R2K 0Y2, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kirk M. Hudson
KIRK M HUDSON OLIFF & BERRIDGEP O BOX 19928ALEXANDRIA, VA 22320UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 019 | non-metal window spacer bars for insulated glass window units | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 14, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 5, 1999 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 14, 1998 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 21, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 8, 1998 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 23, 1997 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 22, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 14, 1997 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 18, 1996 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 11, 1996 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 25, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 9, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 29, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 26, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 19, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |