USPTO serial 75010668
CELLOGIX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TINGLEY, JOHN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CELLOGIX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Salt Lake City, UT
Salt Lake City, UT
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lester K. Essig
LESTER K ESSIG RAY, QUINNEY & NEBEKERP O BOX 45385SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84145-0385UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer programs and associated instruction manuals sold as a unit therewith for use in the fields of manufacturing, automation and process control, namely, operator identification, lot identification, lot specifications, recipe specifications, recipe messaging, recipe management, lot processing, real time processes, assembly, lot tracking, verification, validation, monitoring, reporting, updating, lot manipulation, lot modification, lot removal, lot transportation, lot delivery, quality control, alarm notification, alarm management, error identification, error reduction, error correction, gathering and storage of data, accounting, statistics, productivity analysis, project management, database management, file management, robotics, communication driver and manufacturing driver applications and control, communication driver and manufacturing driver communication and interfacing, equipment and machine applications and control, user-interface, text interface, execution system interface and systems integration | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 21, 1999 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 19, 1998 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 28, 1998 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 8, 1997 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 29, 1997 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 29, 1997 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 4, 1997 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 4, 1997 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 1, 1996 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 29, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 28, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 24, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |