USPTO serial 75011469
THE MERCER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LEIFMAN, ARI
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with THE MERCER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Sheldon Palmer
Sheldon Palmer galvin & palmer630 third avenue23rd floornew york, NY 10017Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | health spa services, hotel, restaurant, bar, cocktail lounge, providing banquet and social function facilities for special occasions, catering, barbershop and beauty salon services, art gallery services, photographic composition for others provided in photographic studios, personal valet and parking valet services and retail pharmacy, retail florist shops, retail shops featuring men's, women's and children's clothing and art and providing meeting and convention room facilities | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 25, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 8, 1997 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 18, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 21, 1996 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| May 12, 1996 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 1, 1996 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 26, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |