USPTO serial 75013228
POLYFLUTE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LAMOTHE, LESLEY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with POLYFLUTE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
GREAT PACIFIC ENTERPRISES INC.
Vancouver, British Columbia V6E 2H2, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Marvin Petry
MARVIN PETRY LARSON AND TAYLOR727 TWENTY-THIRD ST SARLINGTON, VA 22202UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 017 | extruded rigid plastic for industrial use and packaging, corrugated documents and document backing made of extruded rigid plastic | ABANDONED | — |
| 019 | extruded rigid plastic for use as building materials, namely glazing for greenhouses, utility panels for walls and fences, waterproof membranes for use in concrete and roofing construction, non-stick linings for concrete forms, waterproof membranes to control hydrostatic pressure on below-grade concrete structures, re-usable foul weather enclosures for construction work areas, and void forming material for use in concrete pouring | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 25, 1996 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 6, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 25, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |