USPTO serial 75014316
VIRTUAL POINT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GLYNN, GERALD
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with VIRTUAL POINT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
St. Laurent, Quebec H4N 2G5, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Donald L. Dennison
DONALD L DENNISON612 CRYSTAL SQ 41745 JEFFERSON DAVIS HWYARLINGTON, VA 22202Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | video-conferencing terminal used to establish a visual, audio and data link between parties at different locations through the use of digital video compression and digital telephone lines; video monitors; video cameras; speakers; loudspeakers; microphones; personal computer based compression decompression apparatus (codec) for use in video conferencing systems; cabinets for electronic circuits and computers; computer control software for use in controlling video conferencing equipment; infrared keypads; pointing devices, namely, pens with tablets and personal computer mouse; video recorders and video cassette recorders; and video document cameras | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 17, 1998 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 5, 1998 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 30, 1997 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 3, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 7, 1997 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 28, 1996 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 5, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 10, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 6, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |