USPTO serial 75014802
LOONEYSPOONS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GOODMAN, CHERYL SUZANNE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with LOONEYSPOONS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Gloucester, Ontario KIT 1P3, CA
OTTAWA, ONTARIO, CA
OTTAWA, ONTARIO, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MARY FRANCES LOVE
MARY FRANCES LOVE WIGMAN COHEN LEITNER & MYERS PC900 - 17TH ST N WSTE 1000WASHINGTON, DC 20006Goods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by GUILTLESS GRUB CO.
- Other trademarks owned by GRANET PUBLISHING INC.
- Other trademarks owned by GRANET PUBLISHING INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Similar marks named LOONEYSPOONS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 8, 2000 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 8, 2000 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 8, 2000 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Sep 17, 1999 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 7, 1999 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 8, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 7, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 22, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 19, 1999 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 5, 1999 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 13, 1998 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 16, 1998 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 25, 1998 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Dec 9, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 8, 1997 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 9, 1997 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 6, 1996 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 29, 1996 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 25, 1996 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 23, 1996 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| May 10, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 6, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |