USPTO serial 75016064
SOUND BITES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BLANDU, FLORENTINA
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SOUND BITES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Paul N. Vanasse
PAUL N VANASSE HASBRO INC1027 NEWPORT AVEPAWTUCKET, RI 02862UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | Hand held units for playing electronic games | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Tiger Electronics, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Tiger Electronics, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by HASBRO, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Similar marks named SOUND BITES
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 21, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 21, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 15, 2005 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 8, 2005 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Sep 8, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 2, 2005 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 28, 2005 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Mar 28, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 19, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 11, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 22, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 22, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 29, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 15, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 27, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 27, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 14, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 22, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 2, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 24, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 4, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 28, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 6, 1996 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 29, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 18, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 9, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |