USPTO serial 75016475
MORNING SPA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TAYLOR, CRAIG
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MORNING SPA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
HARRIET E. PERKINS
HARRIET M SINTON SEIDEL GONDA LAVORGNA & MONACO, PCSTE 1800TWO PENN CTR PLZPHILADELPHIA, PA 19102Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | bath and body care products, namely, shower gels, bath oils, moisturizing body wash, body lotions, foot lotions, body creams, body powder, bath powder, hair shampoo, hair conditioner, facial and body scrubs, and cosmetics, namely, lipsticks, mascara, eye liner, eye shadow, body soaps, fragrant body sprays, make-up, and nail color | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 17, 2000 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 17, 2000 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Apr 14, 2000 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 15, 2000 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Aug 27, 1999 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 28, 1999 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Mar 1, 1999 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 9, 1999 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 17, 1999 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 3, 1998 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Oct 20, 1998 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 20, 1998 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 14, 1998 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 17, 1998 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 6, 1998 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 29, 1997 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 30, 1997 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 27, 1997 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 31, 1996 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 29, 1996 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 6, 1996 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 4, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 19, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 11, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 11, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |