Drawing for BET TECHNOLOGY, INC.

USPTO serial 75016723

BET TECHNOLOGY, INC.

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BLOHM, LINDA
Law office
TTAB

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with BET TECHNOLOGY, INC.?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Joseph D. Lewis

JOSEPH D LEWIS BARNES & THORNBURG750 17TH ST NW STE 900WASHINGTON, DC 20006UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
028equipment sold as a unit for playing casino card games, casino dice games, and games of chanceABANDONED—
041casino servicesABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 1, 2006MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
Mar 1, 2006ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Mar 1, 2006OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Mar 1, 2006OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999—
Feb 6, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 3, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 18, 1997OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Oct 2, 1996ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Sep 3, 1996PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 2, 1996NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 16, 1996CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 30, 1996CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
May 16, 1996CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 10, 1996DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance