USPTO serial 75017336
XTEND
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MERMELSTEIN, DAVID
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with XTEND?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Milton M. Oliver
MILTON M OLIVER WARE FRESSOLA, VAN DER SLUYS ET ALP O BOX 224755 MAIN STMONROE, CT 06468Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 037 | maintenance and repairing of apparatus for telecommunications | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | rental of telecommunications apparatus, namely, communications equipment, systems for video teleconferencing, firewall systems, routers, multiplexers, and telephone PABX's (private automatic branch exchanges) | INACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 26, 1999 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 26, 1999 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Apr 2, 1999 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Apr 2, 1999 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Feb 4, 1999 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Mar 27, 1998 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 29, 1998 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 29, 1998 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Dec 12, 1997 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 6, 1997 | NAUD | NOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - MAILED | — |
| Oct 1, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 26, 1997 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 23, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 28, 1997 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 25, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 23, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 21, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |