USPTO serial 75018043
MAGICOM MULTIMEDIA CORP.
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SMIGA, HOWARD
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MAGICOM MULTIMEDIA CORP.?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
IMAGITEC MULTIMEDIA CORPORATION
Nanaimo, British Columbia, CA
IMAGITEC MULTIMEDIA CORPORATION
Nanaimo, British Columbia, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
KEVIN G SMITH
SUSAN M BELIVEAU BISHOP & CO347 LEON AVE STE 206 CENTURY PLKELOWNA, BC V1Y 8C7CANADAGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer game software, computer software for desktop publishing, for instruction in the fields of mathematics, science, geography, history, for business planning and management, and for accounting and instructional manuals sold therewith as a unit | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by IMAGITEC MULTIMEDIA CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by IMAGITEC MULTIMEDIA CORPORATION
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named MAGICOM MULTIMEDIA CORP.
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 10, 1998 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 31, 1998 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 6, 1998 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 5, 1997 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 21, 1997 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 21, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 20, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 14, 1997 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 9, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 9, 1997 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Oct 9, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 27, 1997 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 4, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 7, 1997 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 2, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 31, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 13, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 10, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |