USPTO serial 75018259
ST. MORITZ
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ABRAMS, JACQUELINE WILLETTE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ST. MORITZ?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Vancouver, Province of British Columbia, CA
Vancouver, Province of British Columbia, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
KAREN S FRANK
KAREN S FRANKES GROUP LEGAL STRATEGIES GROUP5905 CHRISTIE AVE 608EMERYVILLE, CA 94608UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 014 | watches, stop watches and clocks | ABANDONED | Jan 1, 1981 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 15, 2002 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Aug 15, 2002 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 15, 2002 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 10, 1999 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 18, 1999 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| May 25, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 23, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 8, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 31, 1997 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 30, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 14, 1997 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Oct 1, 1997 | LOPT | LETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE FORWARDED | — |
| Sep 8, 1997 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 8, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 27, 1996 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 8, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 1, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |