USPTO serial 75018679
DIRT DEVIL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LE, MARGARET
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DIRT DEVIL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Patrick R. Roche
PATRICK R ROCHE FAY, SHARPE, BEALL, FAGAN, ET AL1100 SUPERIOR AVE STE 700CLEVELAND, OH 44114-2518UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 021 | waste paper baskets; dust bins; brooms; brushes; buckets; cleaning cloths, mitts, pads and rags for wiping and dusting; soap containers; dust pans; dusters; lint removers; mops, parts and accessories therefor, including sponge and cloth replacement cartridges; paper towels dispensers; cleaning towelettes; scouring sponges and brushes; and, squeegees for household use | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 7, 2000 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 7, 2000 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 6, 2000 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 19, 1999 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Aug 6, 1999 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 6, 1999 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| May 20, 1999 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jan 8, 1999 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 30, 1998 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 20, 1998 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Nov 20, 1998 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 27, 1998 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 26, 1998 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 20, 1998 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 20, 1998 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 6, 1998 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 20, 1997 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 20, 1997 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 25, 1997 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 24, 1997 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 6, 1996 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 3, 1996 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 17, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 17, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 16, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 1, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |