Drawing for ULTRA-TECH

USPTO serial 75019168

ULTRA-TECH

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FRAZIER, JEFFERY
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ULTRA-TECH?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lawrence M. Friedman

LAWRENCE M FRIEDMAN BARNES, RICHARDSON & COLBURN200 E RANDOLPH DRSTE 7920CHICAGO, IL 60601

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007machine parts, namely, ball bearings, cylindrical roller bearings, spherical roller bearings, needle roller bearing, tapered roller bearings and plain shaft bearings; ball bearings, cylindrical roller bearings, spherical roller bearings, needle roller bearing, tapered roller bearings and plain shaft bearings for land vehicles enginesABANDONED—
012land, water and air vehicle non-engine parts, namely, ball bearings, cylindrical roller bearings, spherical roller bearing, needle roller bearings, tapered roller bearings, and plain shaft bearingsABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 28, 1998ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 2, 1998EX3MSOU EXTENSION 3 DENIAL LETTER MAILED—
Sep 2, 1998EX3DSOU EXTENSION 3 DENIAL LETTER PREPARED—
Aug 18, 1998EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Mar 27, 1998EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Feb 18, 1998EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Sep 5, 1997EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Aug 18, 1997EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Feb 18, 1997NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 26, 1996PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 25, 1996NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 30, 1996CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 23, 1996CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jul 5, 1996CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 22, 1996CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 10, 1996DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance