USPTO serial 75020109
GRAIN GOURMET
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WILSON, ANGELA BISHOP
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with GRAIN GOURMET?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ROBERT J. BAYNHAM
ROBERT J BAYNHAM SEED AND BERRY6300 COLUMBIA CTRSEATTLE, WA 98104-7092UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | food products, namely pancake/waffle mixes, baking mixes, hot cereals, cold cereals, muffin mixes, cookie mixes, brownie mixes, bread mixes, frozen breakfasts (pancake/waffles/French toast), Bulgur wheat, rice mixes, Bulgur wheat mixes, rice/long grain rice/wild grain rice, cous cous mixes, taboule (wheat salad mix), pilaf mixes, Middle Eastern grain mixes, soups, oat grain mixes, barley grain mixes, bran mixes, lentils, red beans, legumes, and pastas | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 24, 1997 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 18, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 9, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |