USPTO serial 75020944
CYBERGOLD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TOOLEY, DAVID E
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CYBERGOLD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
CHARLES E. WANDS
JAMES F MCKEOWN CROWELL & MORING LLPPO BOX 14300WASHINGTON, DC 20044-4300UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | administration of an electronic medium of exchange, namely an international monetary system backed by precious metal specie in the physical custody of applicant or its sub-contractors | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Gold & Silver Reserve, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by GOLD & SILVER RESERVE, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Gold & Silver Reserve, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Similar marks named CYBERGOLD
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 16, 2008 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 16, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 16, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 11, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 17, 2007 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 21, 2006 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Nov 21, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 25, 2006 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| May 4, 2006 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| May 4, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 19, 2005 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 25, 2005 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Nov 25, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 9, 2005 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 15, 2005 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 15, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 25, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 24, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 24, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 24, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 25, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 25, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 2, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 11, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 22, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 5, 2003 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 6, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 26, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 10, 2002 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Aug 3, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 20, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 22, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 10, 1997 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 2, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 23, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 17, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 15, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |