USPTO serial 75021098
TECHNOCEL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2229818Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 9, 1999
- Examiner
- SARAI, BALDEV
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with TECHNOCEL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Fleenerweg 2, DE
Fleenerweg 2, DE
Fleenerweg 2, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
KARIN SEGALL
KARIN SEGALL DARBY & DARBY PC805 THIRD AVE 27TH FLNEW YORK, NY 10022-7513UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | cellulose fillers for use in producing rubber, plastics and paper | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Nov 21, 1991 |
| 002 | fillers for use in the producing materials, paints and lacquers; fillers and stabilizers for use in the production of sealants for painting materials and paints | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Nov 21, 1991 |
| 003 | fillers for use in producing cleansing materials for body and beauty care | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Nov 21, 1991 |
| 018 | fillers and stabilizers for use in the production of polyurethane leather | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Nov 21, 1991 |
| 019 | fillers for use in the production of road surfacing asphalt, roof tile asphalt, sealants, namely, tar-based sealants for asphalt, grouts; fillers and stabilizers used in the construction and building maintenance industries made of natural fibers suitable for configuration stabilization; technological fillers made of agricultural, forest, lumbering and natural organic products for the production of chemically related building products for use in roadway construction, spackling putty, plasters, bitumen masses, paints, lacquers, for processing as granules, fiber, powders or pellets; and natural configuration stabilizing fiber in varying sizes for mixing with bitumen, resin, cement, gypsum, latex and basic building materials, namely, sand, aggregate, non-agriculture lime and mineral filler | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Nov 21, 1991 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Rettenmaier, Felix
- Other trademarks owned by Rettenmaier, Felix
- Other trademarks owned by Rettenmaier, Felix
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Other trademarks in Class 002
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 018
- Other trademarks in Class 019
- Similar marks named TECHNOCEL
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 17, 2005 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Mar 9, 1999 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 15, 1998 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 13, 1998 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 25, 1998 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 28, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 24, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 7, 1997 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Aug 27, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 4, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 24, 1997 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Mar 14, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 3, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 17, 1997 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 18, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 14, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 4, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |