USPTO serial 75021645
CALLAWAY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ZAK, HENRY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CALLAWAY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Charles N.J. Ruggiero
LAURIE FEIGENBAUM FEIGENBAUM PUBLISHING CONSULTANTS INC61 BOUNTY LNJERICHO, NY 11753UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 024 | towels, comforters and bed sheets | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 1, 2005 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 1, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 24, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 28, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 26, 1999 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 25, 1999 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 25, 1999 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Oct 6, 1997 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 8, 1997 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 1, 1997 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Nov 29, 1996 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 22, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 18, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 16, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 15, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |