Drawing for BIONUMERIK

USPTO serial 75022608

BIONUMERIK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 607
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
COFIELD, JULIA
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BIONUMERIK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Larry B. Phillips, III

LARRY B PHILLIPS III4200 TEXAS COMMERCE TWRHOUSTON, TX 77002UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042designing novel drugs for others using high speed computerACTIVESep 1, 2000

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 4, 2002ABN7ABANDONMENT - DEFECTIVE USE STATEMENT—
Jul 16, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 10, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 3, 2001SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Apr 10, 2001IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Oct 10, 2000NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 27, 2000PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 26, 2000NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 8, 1999CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 8, 1999ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jul 14, 1997CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 11, 1997REINREINSTATED—
Jan 13, 1997ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 30, 1996CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 7, 1996DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance