Drawing for HELICAL BRAID

USPTO serial 75022783

HELICAL BRAID

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KIM, SOPHIA SUJIN
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HELICAL BRAID?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

W. Hugo Liepmann

W HUGO LIEPMANN LAHIVE & COCKFIELD60 STATE STBOSTON, MA 02109UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
012boat parts, namely masts and booms of composite materialsABANDONED—
017pipe and tubing of composite material; composite spoolable pipe and tubingABANDONED—
028tubular structures of composite materials for gymnastic equipment, for sporting equipment, or for exercise equipment; gymnastic bars and weight lifting machines; tubular shafts of composite materials for use in athletic and sporting articles, namely golf clubs, fishing rods, hockey sticks, baseball bats, tennis racquets, squash racquets, racquetball racquets, badminton racquets, table tennis racquets, and rowing oars and paddlesABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 24, 1997ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Jan 24, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 2, 1996CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 30, 1996CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 21, 1996DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 16, 1996DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance