USPTO serial 75022783
HELICAL BRAID
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KIM, SOPHIA SUJIN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with HELICAL BRAID?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
W. Hugo Liepmann
W HUGO LIEPMANN LAHIVE & COCKFIELD60 STATE STBOSTON, MA 02109UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | boat parts, namely masts and booms of composite materials | ABANDONED | — |
| 017 | pipe and tubing of composite material; composite spoolable pipe and tubing | ABANDONED | — |
| 028 | tubular structures of composite materials for gymnastic equipment, for sporting equipment, or for exercise equipment; gymnastic bars and weight lifting machines; tubular shafts of composite materials for use in athletic and sporting articles, namely golf clubs, fishing rods, hockey sticks, baseball bats, tennis racquets, squash racquets, racquetball racquets, badminton racquets, table tennis racquets, and rowing oars and paddles | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 24, 1997 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Jan 24, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 2, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 30, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 21, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 16, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |