USPTO serial 75022784
H BRAID
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- —
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with H BRAID?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
W. Hugo Liepmann
W HUGO LIEPMANN LAHIVE & COCKFIELD LLP28 STATE STBOSTON, MA 02109UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | structural parts for boats, namely, masts and booms of composite materials | ABANDONED | — |
| 017 | tubular structures of plastic composite materials for use in gymnastic equipment, sporting equipment, and exercise equipment; tubular shafts of plastic composite materials for use in golf clubs, fishing rods, hockey sticks, baseball bats, tennis racquets, squash racquets, racquetball racquets, badminton racquets, table tennis racquets, and rowing oars and paddles; pipe and tubing of plastic composite material for subterranean use; plastic composite spoolable pipe and spoolable tubing for subterranean use | ABANDONED | — |
| 028 | tubular structures of composite materials as a component part of gymnastic equipment, sporting equipment, and exercise equipment; tubular shafts of composite materials as a component part of golf clubs, fishing rods, hockey sticks, baseball bats, tennis racquets, squash racquets, racquetball racquets, badminton racquets, table tennis racquets, and rowing oars and paddles | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Composite Development Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by Composite Development Corporation
- Other trademarks in Class 012
- Other trademarks in Class 017
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Similar marks named H BRAID
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 18, 1998 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 2, 1998 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 12, 1998 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 16, 1997 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 24, 1997 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 23, 1997 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 17, 1997 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 14, 1997 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 6, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 2, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 30, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 21, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 16, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |