USPTO serial 75023257
PARKCHIP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2357840Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 13, 2000
- Examiner
- LAWRENCE, ANDREW D
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with PARKCHIP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
40217 Dusseldorf, DE
40217 Dusseldorf, DE
40217 Dusseldorf, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Steven F. Caserza
STEVEN F CASERZA FLEHR, HOHBACH, TEST, ALBRITTON, ET ALSTE 3400FOUR EMBARCADERO CTRSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111-4187Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | blank electronic data storage devices, namely, tokens; codeable chip cards and tokens; and data carriers, namely, computer tapes, discs and wire; and programmable electronic data storage devices, namely, tokens | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Aug 14, 1998 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Farmont Technik GmbH & Co. KG
- Other trademarks owned by Farmont Technik GmbH & Co. KG
- Other trademarks owned by Farmont Technik GmbH & Co. KG
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named PARKCHIP
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 17, 2007 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Mar 24, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 13, 2000 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 19, 2000 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Feb 28, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 20, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 23, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 17, 1999 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 14, 1999 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 18, 1998 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 16, 1998 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 15, 1998 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 13, 1998 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 9, 1997 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 4, 1997 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 20, 1997 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 25, 1997 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 24, 1997 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 2, 1997 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 6, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 16, 1996 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 23, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 25, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 19, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |