USPTO serial 75024851
CONTOUR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LAMOTHE, LESLEY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CONTOUR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Martin P. Hoffman
MARTIN P HOFFMAN HOFFMAN, WASSON & GITLER, PC2361 JEFFERSON DAVIS HWYSTE 522ARLINGTON, VA 22202Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | foundation garments for woman, namely, body shapers | ACTIVE | Dec 31, 1975 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 14, 2002 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jan 14, 2002 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 14, 2002 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Mar 12, 2001 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 19, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 31, 2000 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jul 11, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 12, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 12, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 1, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 29, 1999 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 29, 1999 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Apr 23, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 12, 1998 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 9, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 3, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 14, 1997 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 8, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 15, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 14, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 15, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |