Drawing for MOBILE SECURITY NETWORK

USPTO serial 75025020

MOBILE SECURITY NETWORK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ATCHISON, ALAN
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MOBILE SECURITY NETWORK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mark D. Engelmann

MARK D ENGELMANN FROSS ZELNICK LEHRMAN & ZISSU, PC633 THIRD AVENEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009cellular communications-based networks using global positioning satellite systems used to locate vehicles and to communicate with a central computerized monitoring centerABANDONED—
035remote monitoring and tracking of vehicles via a central computerized monitoring center and cellular communications-based networks using global positioning satellite systems for use in ascertaining the location of a vehicle and/or for summoning emergency or other assistance to the vehicle's locationABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 9, 1998ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Mar 9, 1998EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Nov 7, 1997CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Sep 18, 1997EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Feb 28, 1997CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 16, 1996CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 14, 1996CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 5, 1996DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 5, 1996DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance