USPTO serial 75025419
RUPERT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GEORGE, ANIL V
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with RUPERT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
London SE1 9UX, GB
London SE1 9UX, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Andrea Rush
ANDREA RUSH GOWLING, STRATHY & HENDERSONSTE 4900COMMERCE COURT WTORONTO, ON M5L 1J3Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 021 | dishes, ceramic plates, ceramic cups and mugs, drinking glasses, coasters, not of paper, and not being table linens, paper cups, plastic cups, paper plates, thermal insulated containers for drink cans and bottles, lunch kits consisting of lunch boxes and thermal insulated containers for food or beverages, plastic serving trays, shot glasses | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 23, 2000 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 23, 2000 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 15, 2000 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 15, 2000 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Dec 15, 1999 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Oct 20, 1999 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 14, 1999 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 14, 1999 | PCRC | PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 16, 1999 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Dec 23, 1998 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 16, 1998 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 26, 1998 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 17, 1998 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 25, 1998 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 15, 1997 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 17, 1997 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 25, 1997 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 21, 1997 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 14, 1997 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 9, 1997 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 26, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 25, 1996 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Oct 24, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 23, 1996 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 16, 1996 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 24, 1996 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 10, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 7, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 25, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |