Drawing for 21ST CENTURY MANNA

USPTO serial 75026172

21ST CENTURY MANNA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
VLCEK, TOMAS V
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with 21ST CENTURY MANNA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

WILLIAM H PAVITT JR

WILLIAM H PAVITT JR BEEHLER & PAVITT100 CORPORATE POINTE STE 330CULVER CITY, CA 90230UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005nutritional herbal supplements to be taken internally as a digestive aid for intestinal disturbances to both detoxify the system and stimulate efficient removal of waste products from the colonACTIVEAug 15, 1995

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 29, 1999ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Oct 29, 1999EXAREXPARTE APPEAL AFFIRMED/REVERSED IN PART—
Oct 20, 1999EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Sep 22, 1998CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Jun 29, 1998EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Nov 12, 1997CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Jun 14, 1997CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
May 8, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 20, 1996CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 26, 1996CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 18, 1996DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 18, 1996ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Mar 21, 1996CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 13, 1996CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Mar 12, 1996DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance