USPTO serial 75026231
ENCHANTEMENT DE GIVENCHY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FISHER, HANNAH
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ENCHANTEMENT DE GIVENCHY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
92300 Levallois Perret, FR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
BARBARA LOEWENTHAL
BARBARA LOEWENTHAL KUHN AND MULLER405 LEXINGTON AVENEW YORK, NY 10174UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | toilet soap, perfume, eau de Cologne, toilet water, essential oils for personal use, milks, lotions, creams, gels for face and body, lipsticks, lip gloss, make-up foundation, tinted creams, mascara, eye shadow, make-up, cosmetic crayons, face powder, make-up remover products in milk, lotion, cream and jelly form, nail varnish, cosmetic bath preparations in jelly, oil and cream form, bath salts, talcum powder, body deodorant; hair preparations, namely lacquer, jelly, cream, balm and shampoo | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 3, 1997 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 23, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 1, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |